e-verifile.us

  the home of billboard democracy


Forum

Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering

Search 
Search Forums:


 




The White Minority
Read original blog post

UserPost

5:39 am
August 19, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

1

By 2042, the Census Bureau says, whites will be a minority in the United States, and among children under 18, whites become the minority in just 15 years.

How long is 15 years? Fifteen years ago, Bill Clinton was president.

So, just around the corner, whites in America are going to be disempowered (assuming we remain a democracy) through a radical and rapid transformation of the nation’s demography on a scale unprecedented in world history.

In response to this news, individual whites–the proper, polite ones–will affect (or, if particularly ignorant of the world around them, evince) an attitude, at the least, of indifference and calm assurance, at the most, of celebratory enthusiasm.

For the sake of clear, adult thinking, let’s dismiss these proper, polite whites as a bunch of panglossian ninnies and adopt a position more in line with everything we know about humans. Let’s say that the Census Bureau projections are deeply troubling and cause for alarm for white Americans (and leave it to the other races in America to decide for themselves what this demographic shift means to them).

Now, if you are a white person reading this, and if you are the type of white person who is already looking around for someone to point and shriek "RACIST!" in front of, you might as well stop reading now. You don’t matter to the following discussion, and it will be over your head anyway.

For everyone else, let’s start by assuming that white Americans share with all peoples throughout the world at all times throughout history the characteristic that being disempowered as a group is a negative–like being conquered, or being subjugated. Let’s assume that it is the same disaster for whites that whites consider it to be for everyone else. Let’s assume there is nothing magical about being white that permits whites the luxury of indifference to this disempowerment–this permanent disempowerment. kenya unrestLet’s assume whites are not so superior that they can ignore gritty bloody reality–that they can ignore as if he were a precocious child, Willie Brown, the black former speaker of the California Assembly, when he says, "I think most white politicians do not understand that the race pride we all have trumps everything else.” Let’s assume the United States is a nation not so exceptional that Americans of any color can opt out of the destiny that demography is.

If we make these assumptions–assumptions future generations will curse us for not making–then the new Census Bureau projections plainly demand an immediate and radical change in public policy, and an all out effort to accomplish this change. In particular, the projections demand an immediate time-out on mass immigration like the 40-year time-out the nation wisely implemented in 1924 at the peak of the last great wave of immigration.

There are many similarities between now and then.

A primary power driving the great immigration wave of the late nineteenth-early twentieth centuries was American business, which steadfastly fought for increasing the supply of labor through mass immigration. As Samuel Gompers, an immigrant and the founder and president of the American Federation of Labor wrote in a 1924 letter to Congress.

"Every effort to enact immigration legislation must expect to meet a number of hostile forces and, in particular, two hostile forces of considerable strength. One of these is composed of corporation employers who desire to employ physical strength (broad backs) at the lowest possible wage and who prefer a rapidly revolving labor supply at low wages to a regular supply of American wage earners at fair wages. The other is composed of racial groups in the United States who oppose all restrictive legislation because they want the doors left open for an influx of their countrymen regardless of the menace to the people of their adopted country."

In 1912, the nation elected one-world utopian Woodrow Wilson, and over the next eight years of Wilson’s presidency the nation’s population grew by 15 percent while President Wilson repeatedly vetoed restrictionist legislation passed by Congress.

Wilson’s successor, Warren Harding, increased the power of corporations in Washington, and the cheap labor wave would likely have continued but for the growing threat to the American system from imported anarchists and radicals.

In September 1920, a bomb one twelfth the size of the Oklahoma City bomb exploded in front of 23 Wall Street in New York City capping years of rising concern over the threat to the domestic order posed by the massive influx of foreigners. As James Fulford writes at VDARE, "Wall Street support for immigration takes a sudden drop" and within four years the great time-out had begun–thirty years after organized efforts to restrict immigration had begun.

It wasn’t until the corrupting influence of the profiteers was sidelined that 1924 America could implement the necessary time-out.

The question we face now, then, is: must we wait for another bombing on Wall Street or its equivalent before the corporate profiteers will again loosen their grip on the nation’s future and stop driving the country headlong into demographic meltdown for their own selfish benefit?

Or can we retake control of immigration policy before that happens?

e-verifile decalThrough the new e-VeriFILE program, Americans have the opportunity to bring the business community to heel by financially rewarding those business owners who follow the law, who understand the principle of enlightened self-interest, who understand that the kind of uncertainty into which some monied interests are selfishly driving the nation is not, in the long run, good for business.

The e-VeriFILE program could become enormously beneficial to the country, and every American should support it.


Read original blog post

4:12 pm
August 25, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

2

Extremely well said. The fact that American elites have convinced
themselves that ever more “diversity is our strength” and that race doesn't
matter because we are an “Idea Nation” would be something like Chinese
leaders believing that China's population can be completely replaced by
Italians and Pigmies and their will be no change in the basic character and
institutions of China–and then move heaven and earth pursing just such
immigration polcies!

Keep up the great work,

9:29 pm
August 25, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

3

Around 1983 I attended a speech at the Neo-Con Heritage Foundation during which a Sovietologist stated that the Soviet Union was going to fall apart and among the reasons was that by the year 2000 Russians would become a minority in the Soviet Union creating stability problems.

Most rolled their eyes thinking the Soviet Union wouldn't fall apart in our lifetimes.

The year 2000 never came for the Soviet Union.

9:40 pm
August 25, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

4

It WAS a pretty good song by Black Flag

9:46 pm
August 25, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

5

Craig, I’m writing to the editor of
U.S. News about this, as he welcomed comments on stories not properly covered –
the obvious story being THIS DOESN’T HAVE TO HAPPEN! No one ever writes
stories about alternatives.

Right, not to mention the historical precedent, e.g., the 40-year imiigration time-out beginning in 1924.

9:49 pm
August 25, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

6

The Alliance for Social Justice
International
Veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi

…you ARE a blatant racist. Pathetic !
+sergius
Archbishop
Holy Transfiguration Skete
Treasure Valley, Idaho USA

How am I a racist?
Is it wrong for me to love my own? Is it evil for me because my skin is white? Because I am a native-born American?
Point out for me, if you can, what in my article was racist.

1. First, I did not know you are an albino. Only albino's have white skin. So must be very difficult for you…pink eyes and all. Which
would explain your mental disturbances to a significant degree.
2. Secondly, AQUILA NON CAPIT MUSCAS. So I have nothing more to say to you: no need; you are self-condemning.
+sergius

Unbeknownst to “Sergius”, my reply to him above is an adapted quote from Sitting Bull, the great Sioux Indian chief. He responded to the Sitting Bull quote with the charge of self-condemning racism. Chief Sitting Bull a racist? LOL, with his charge of “self-condemning racism”, he self-condemns.

This exchange prompted the next ezine, Panglossian ninny shrieking racism unwittingly proves my point

10:12 pm
August 25, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

7

Craig,

One of the worst problems with whites becoming a minority will be a
corresponding drop in intelligence. I recall reading I.Q. 83 several years
ago.

With a lowering of average IQ to this level, even traffic lights wouldn't
run properly. Much less would we have medical or technological advances
enough to keep the nation civilized.

A minority population would be the end of this country.

10:32 pm
August 25, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

8

To be clear, the central thrust of your concern is that when one group does not represent a majority, they are subjugated.

No, to be clear, I wrote that to lose the majority is assumed by all to be a negative, like being subjugated.

That in years to come, whites will no longer be the majority (leaving aside that we will
remain the plurality) and therefor will feel be subjugated and “conquered.” By your definition, other blacks and Hispanics, in minority status are “disempowered,” and whites hold a superior position.

Whites are, and have always been in the history of this country, the dominant power. Significantly, minorities have been empowered in this country by leave of the dominant majority (arguing against the core belief by so many, e.g., Barack Obama, the the history of the United States is a history of white racism and white oppression). There is nothing to guarantee that minoroties will always be treated so magnanimously.

Public policy must be prescribed to maintain white superior position based solely on skin color.

Dude. I’m not reaching to call that racist. I’m trying to figure out
how it in any way, is NOT racist. It is the belief that one race should
dominate others and the dangers if that dominant race is no longer
white.

“There is no “should” about it. It simply “is”.

You’ll note, I’m not calling you a racist but if you don’t want
to be considered one, stop sending out e-mails like this.

Would you call the Tibetans who resist the new majority Han Chinese majority in their capital city “racist”? Would you call Chief Sitting Bull's resistance to the white influx into Lakota territory “racist”? I'll wager you wouldn't. Yet you hold me to some (higher?) standard because I'm white. Dude, isn't that the real racism?

10:58 pm
August 25, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

9

Dear Craig: Clear summary of the problem. Unfortunately, the terrorist
events of 9/11 did not motivate an “immigration time out” like
they should have. WDC is likely to be the “ground zero” for
something bigger than 04/19/95 in Oklahoma City.

10:59 pm
August 25, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

10

What a BUNCH OF b.S.

11:00 pm
August 25, 2008


Craig

Admin

posts 50

11

Please remove me from your list. I have
now blocked your site.

3:09 am
October 5, 2008


sheniwood

New Member

Peru

posts 2

12

I'm a Peruvian of Chinese origin living in Peru. The last time I visited the USA I almost didn't need to speak English, Spanish was spoken everywhere.

I see with sorrow how that Anglo-Protestant heritage that built the USA will be lost (Did you read Samuel Huntington's “Who Are We? The Challenges to America's National Identity”). Will the USA be converted into an extension of Latin America? Maybe this will be reality in 50 years and I think it's too late to change the tendency.

5:57 pm
October 18, 2008


sheniwood

New Member

Peru

posts 2

13
I'm new in your forum but I have some concerns. According to a University of Minnesota study, 77% of white Americans believe “their race has a distinct culture that should be preserved.” Unfortunately I don't see any government policies regarding this issue.
Anglo-Protestants immigrants build the United States as a country of democracy and freedom and convert it into the most developed nation of the world. But now the U.S.A. is receiving people from all over the world, what will be the result? Humanity is so diverse, we can't pretend to convert a country into a “melting pot”. Each country should preserve its own original culture and characteristics.
Remember what happened to the Roman Empire and their intention to rule so many and different ethnic groups? The lack of identification of their people with the original Roman culture made it vulnerable to the barbarian hordes and conduct it to the disintegration of the empire.
In the United Kingdom is predicted that whites will become a minority in 2100, a minority in their home country! where they have been living for milleniums!
Immigration is good if a country needs to extend its work force, but it's always needed the establishment of quotas (like President Coolidge did in 1924) according to the nation's interests, otherwhise it will endanger the traditions and culture of the host country.
In my country, Peru, we had immigration from Africa, Asia and Europe but it wasn't massive, so all immigrants were assimilated in 2 generations. Immigrants adopted inmediately the social customs of the host country: religion, language, etc.
Nobody can deny that other cultures should be preserved, why there is not the same treatment to the Anglo-Saxon culture in the U.S.A.?

4:54 pm
November 13, 2008


newparty

New Member

posts 2

14

If anyone is interested in starting a political party, let me know. My email address is newparty2008@yahoo.com The Republicans and demorats have sold out the country to get votes from interest groups. The result: a balkanized nation of 500 million people, many of whom detest western values, a plundered environment, increased poverty for all. Can anyone actually say that they have personally benefitted from immigration. Believe it or not, we had a functioning economy in the 40s, 50s, and 60s.

This new party is serious and it can really win. If you really are serious about stopping immigration…. a new party….. which appeals to democrats and republicans who oppose immigration…. is the only choice.



Reply to Topic: The White Minority

NOTE: New Posts are subject to administrator approval before being displayed

Guest Name (Required):

Guest EMail (Required):

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of: 3 + 10        (Required)

Topic Reply:


 

About the ProjectUSA forum

Currently Online:

1 Guest

Maximum Online: 16

Forums:

Groups: 1

Forums: 5

Topics: 17

Posts: 57

Members:

There are 11 members

There are 1 guests

Craig has made 50 posts

Top Posters:

sheniwood - 2

newparty - 2

AZFighter - 1

twins.fan - 1

EGALICKI - 1

Administrator: Craig


© Simple:Press Forum - Version 3.0.3 (Build 320)  

Share or Bookmark
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Blogosphere News
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Smarking
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis