In emails below

Subject: doug, you should have received the statement of org by now
..........From: todd_thorpe@yahoo.com ..........Todd Thorpe ..........
..........Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
..........To:
..........dougcannon@cfourusa.com
..........
..........before submitting any documents to the FEC, lt. gov. office, bramble or
..........anyone, please run them by david safavian.
..........
..........would you please reply to insure this is perfectly clear.
..........
..........thanks.
..........
..........__________________________________________________
..........Do You Yahoo!?
..........Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
..........a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ hm/
..........

Subject: FW:
..........From:
< sdwares@cfourusa.com > ..........Scott Wares
..........Date:
..........Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:00:56 -0600
..........To:
< chriscannon@uswest.net> ..........Chris Cannon
..........CC:
< dougcannon@cfourusa.com> ..........Doug Cannon
..........
..........what do you think of this?
..........
..........You can bet that Jeff Hartley was blind copied in. Todd makes some legitimate points but he is clearly against this project nor does he understand what is being proposed. I would feel comfortable going through things with him but certainly not telling him very much regarding any C4 development. It also seems apparent that David is behind this query. As stated in the statement of work a plan needs to be coordinated together with the campaign - this is a joint effort. I feel that Todd thinks he is getting this pushed at him be us. Is this going to be another opponent at every turn? If so, C4 does not need another detractor and should avoid working with Todd to prevent wasting time AGAIN on a detractor. As much as we want to do this project, and are capable of doing a superior job - if the paradigm exists from the beginning that this is a illegitimate, nothing